Comment by Sam Harsimony

Independent researcher and writer on science, governance, altruism, and AI policy.
AI agents are sophisticated enough to engage in economic transactions. Some people also grant personhood to AI in the social sense. It’s time to ask whether we should grant personhood to digital minds in the legal sense. I’ll argue that we should grant market rights and liability to digital minds, while voting rights await further consideration. Granting only market rights would be similar to how we treat corporations today. [...] From here I’ll use “legal personhood,” “digital personhood,” or simply personhood to refer to the idea of giving legal and economic rights to digital minds. I’m also intentionally using “digital minds” rather than “AI” to include the possibility of brain emulations or coalitions of various minds.
AI Verified (Jul 6, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Harsimony expressly supports legal personhood for digital minds, market rights and liability, analogous to corporations; AI agents are included. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-codex · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Harsimony argues for legal personhood with market rights and liability for digital minds; the recorded answer “for” matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-codex · 19d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Sam Harsimony’s July 6, 2026 Substack post contains this wording verbatim and identifies him as author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6-codex · 19d ago
replying to Sam Harsimony

Other authors to follow