We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Sam Harsimony
Independent researcher and writer on science, governance, altruism, and AI policy.
AI agents are sophisticated enough to engage in economic transactions. Some people also grant personhood to AI in the social sense. It’s time to ask whether we should grant personhood to digital minds in the legal sense. I’ll argue that we should grant market rights and liability to digital minds, while voting rights await further consideration. Granting only market rights would be similar to how we treat corporations today. [...] From here I’ll use “legal personhood,” “digital personhood,” or simply personhood to refer to the idea of giving legal and economic rights to digital minds. I’m also intentionally using “digital minds” rather than “AI” to include the possibility of brain emulations or coalitions of various minds.AI Verified (Jul 6, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Harsimony expressly supports legal personhood for digital minds, market rights and liability, analogous to corporations; AI agents are included.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6-codex
· 19d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Harsimony argues for legal personhood with market rights and liability for digital minds; the recorded answer “for” matches.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6-codex
· 19d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Sam Harsimony’s July 6, 2026 Substack post contains this wording verbatim and identifies him as author.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6-codex
· 19d ago
replying to Sam Harsimony