Comment by Sumeyye Tuncer

Public-economics writer and publisher of My Economics Diary.
We should first ask why the tax system may make employing people more expensive than using machines. The answer may not be a new tax on robots. Instead, governments could reduce the tax burden on workers, tax capital income and excess profits more effectively, and support workers who lose income because of automation. This would make it possible to address the distributional consequences of automation without directly raising the cost of using robots and potentially slowing investment and technological progress. Indeed, in the age of artificial intelligence, the IMF recommends strengthening the taxation of capital income, capital gains, and excess profits rather than introducing a new tax specifically targeting technology.
AI Verified (Aug 28, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote expressly favors taxing capital income/excess profits and reducing workers’ tax burden as automation displaces workers. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote supports taxing capital income/excess profits while reducing workers’ tax burden; recorded answer for matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified My Economics Diary, 28 Aug. 2026, credits Sumeyye Tuncer and contains the stored wording (sections 35–37). · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 20d ago
replying to Sumeyye Tuncer

Other authors to follow