Comment by Alessandro Crimi

Professor at AGH University of Krakow; researcher in AI, computer science, and health economics.
With AI, although potential compensatory mechanisms such as new tasks and productivity gains are promised, history cautions us that such benefits are neither automatic nor equitably shared. [...] Prominent tax scholars have argued that a new, targeted robot tax is less effective than reforming broader capital taxation systems, suggesting that its political appeal may stem from behavioral biases more than sound fiscal policy. [...] If productivity increasingly derives from capital rather than labor, continued reliance on labor-based taxation becomes normatively unstable.
AI Verified (Sep 18, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Verified: the quote ties AI/automation to a post-labor economy, rejects continued labor-based taxation, and favors broader capital-tax reform. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Verified for: Crimi favors moving beyond labor taxation toward broader capital-tax reform in an AI/automation-driven post-labor economy. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: Rest of World’s September 18, 2026 bylined essay contains the quoted passages (lines 92, 99, 103). · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
replying to Alessandro Crimi

Other authors to follow