We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by George Balston
Strategic Adviser to the Alan Turing Institute and co-founder of AVERI; former UK government researcher, data scientist, and technical lead focused on AI, privacy, and government technology.
Open-weight models introduce new and unique risks – they provide near-frontier capabilities which could be used for criminal purposes, are widely available to anyone who intends harm, and are easier to misuse. [...] Major frontier AI companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Google do not release the weights of their frontier models. This means they alone can patch the model, add or tighten safeguards, and as a last resort remove the model from circulation entirely. An open-weight model, on the other hand, has no such restrictions – the developer publishes the weights and thereafter has no meaningful ability to recall, patch or supervise any copies.AI Verified (Sep 18, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Balston explicitly contrasts open-weight models’ near-frontier criminal misuse, broad availability, ease of misuse and irretrievable copies with closed frontier models that companies can patch, safeguard or remove. This covers the claimed relative danger.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 20d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The statement is supported: the quote explicitly says open-weight models create unique misuse and control risks absent from closed frontier models, matching “for.”
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 20d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
RUSI’s 18 Sep 2026 commentary is a single-author article by George Balston and contains the stored open-weight/closed-weight passages verbatim.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 20d ago
replying to George Balston