Comment by Brian Armstrong

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Armstrong directly rejects the claim that building AI could cause “we” to die, calling it backwards, and says AI improves safety by preventing deaths. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Armstrong says the claim that building AI could make humanity die is backwards, so the recorded “against” answer is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Full-claim match: the quote addresses AI development/capability growth and a slower pace, pause, halt, or explicit rejection/mixed position. Evidence: die. But they have it backwards. [...] AI is helping us solve these. Slowing progress doesn’t keep us safer, it guarantees more preventable deaths. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded against matches the quote's stance on slowing AI development. Evidence: die. But they have it backwards. [...] AI is helping us solve these. Slowing progress doesn’t keep us safer, it guarantees more preventable deaths. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Benzinga’s September 23, 2026 report quotes Armstrong verbatim: “AI doomers say if we build AI we might die. But they have it backwards” and “Slowing progress doesn’t keep us safer, it guarantees more preventable deaths.” · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
replying to Brian Armstrong

Other opinions from Brian Armstrong

See all

Other authors to follow