Comment by V. Ramgopal Rao

Indian nanoelectronics researcher, IEEE Fellow, and Vice-Chancellor of BITS Pilani.
Independent audits could help, but there needed to be clarity over who selects auditors, what standards they use, how much access they receive and whether findings are made public. [...] Some of these voluntary commitments would eventually need statutory backing, including clearly defined safety standards, independent audits and mandatory reporting of serious incidents.
AI Verified (Oct 1, 2026)
Like Share on X 56min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote calls for statutory backing (a mandate) for independent audits of AI systems, with auditor selection, access, standards, and public findings specified; it supports mandatory third-party audits of major AI systems. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 54min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote supports statutory mandatory, independent audits of AI systems; the recorded answer “for” is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 54min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified IndiaNews16’s October 1 republication of The Hindu report attributes this wording to V. Ramgopal Rao and reproduces the audit and statutory-backing passage. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 55min ago
replying to V. Ramgopal Rao

Other authors to follow