We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Caleb Knapp
AI policy professional and Director of Government Affairs at The AI Policy Network; formerly Senior Policy Manager at The Alliance for Secure AI.
Congress should not make that mistake. [...] Lawmakers across the aisle are locked in a broader fight over whether states should retain the ability to legislate on AI across certain subject areas, or at all. Supporters of preemption often argue that a federal regulatory ceiling is necessary to avoid a patchwork of state AI laws. However, that concern bears little resemblance to reality. The states that have taken action are building governance structures that are increasingly functioning as de-facto national standard-setters. [...] California’s SB 53 established transparency requirements, safety disclosures, incident reporting obligations, and whistleblower protections for frontier AI developers.AI Verified (Aug 3, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Knapp opposes a federal AI-law ceiling and says states should retain authority to legislate and set AI-governance standards.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 57min ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Recorded for is correct: Knapp opposes federal preemption and supports states’ AI-law authority.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 57min ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Fortune’s Aug. 3, 2026 Caleb Knapp commentary contains the stored text and byline.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 58min ago
replying to Caleb Knapp