Comment by Michael David Angel

Independent technology writer publishing analysis of AI, machine learning, and future technology.
Plan A is the alternative. Delay superintelligence to 2040. Make all AI research public. Let dozens of companies in dozens of countries catch up to the frontier. And enter, deliberately and with eyes open, a regime of mutually assured compute destruction. [...] Under the deal, all post-deal frontier training happens in new, purpose-built, highly secure R&D datacenters. And when the Consortium builds them, the United States and China agree to site them in the third-party countries least secure against the other’s military intervention. America’s clusters go to Mongolia. China’s go to Canada. [...] I don’t know if Plan A is right.
AI Verified (Jul 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

abstains
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly describes a U.S.–China mutually assured compute-destruction arrangement and says the author is uncertain whether it is right. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The author says “I don’t know if Plan A is right,” which matches the recorded abstain vote. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Michael David Angel’s 11 Jul 2026 Substack post contains the quoted Plan A description and his explicit uncertainty. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 19d ago
replying to Michael David Angel

Other authors to follow