We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Kar Mun Nicole Wong
AI governance researcher; Yale School of Management and Jackson School of Global Affairs alumna.
On biological capabilities, independent evaluator SecureBio found that Kimi K3 was roughly comparable to closed models from about eight months earlier. When prompted with questions designed to elicit dangerous biological information, the model declined to answer only 26.9% of the time. By comparison, top-performing closed-weight models refused over 90%. More importantly, such refusals matter little in open models, since safeguards are easy to remove once the weights are downloaded.AI Verified (Oct 14, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote compares open and closed models: open-model safeguards are easy to remove, while top closed models refuse dangerous bio requests at over 90%, supporting greater danger from open-source AI.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 20d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Recorded author matches the quote author. The comparison shows removable safeguards and lower refusal in open models than closed models; correct answer: for.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 20d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
AI Policy Bulletin’s 2026-10-14 article by Kar Mun Nicole Wong contains the stored passages verbatim.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 20d ago
replying to Kar Mun Nicole Wong