Comment by Felix Choussat

AI governance researcher and former Pivotal Research AI Safety Fellow, studying AI capability proliferation and great-power competition.
Destroying compute alone is not enough to force a stalemate. Minimal strikes buy one to two years; medium strikes combining datacenter and supply-chain attacks buy around three; maximal persistent strikes reach roughly four to five years at most, and require hitting several dozen targets across datacenters and fabs. The defender's response matters more than the strike: centralizing 90% of surviving compute offsets 80% to 90% of the delay, which can make a minimal strike counterproductive. The paper argues against relying on kinetic sabotage for indefinite deterrence and for lower-escalation mechanisms that leave room to negotiate.
AI Verified (2026)
Like Share on X 2h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified It directly assesses U.S.–China compute destruction and argues against kinetic sabotage as deterrence. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 16min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote argues against relying on U.S.–China compute sabotage for deterrence; against is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 16min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Pivotal Research’s page identifies Felix Choussat and reproduces this summary verbatim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 16min ago
replying to Felix Choussat

Other authors to follow