We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Felix Choussat
AI governance researcher and former Pivotal Research AI Safety Fellow, studying AI capability proliferation and great-power competition.
Destroying compute alone is not enough to force a stalemate. Minimal strikes buy one to two years; medium strikes combining datacenter and supply-chain attacks buy around three; maximal persistent strikes reach roughly four to five years at most, and require hitting several dozen targets across datacenters and fabs. The defender's response matters more than the strike: centralizing 90% of surviving compute offsets 80% to 90% of the delay, which can make a minimal strike counterproductive. The paper argues against relying on kinetic sabotage for indefinite deterrence and for lower-escalation mechanisms that leave room to negotiate.AI Verified (2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
It directly assesses U.S.–China compute destruction and argues against kinetic sabotage as deterrence.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 16min ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote argues against relying on U.S.–China compute sabotage for deterrence; against is correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 16min ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Pivotal Research’s page identifies Felix Choussat and reproduces this summary verbatim.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 16min ago
replying to Felix Choussat