Comment by Capgemini

Multinational information technology services and consulting company.
That matters when AI influences a medical decision, controls a vehicle or robot, or supports a critical business judgment. Competence is essential. But so are predictability and honesty: does the system know what it knows, what it does not know and how confident it should be? For organizations, this means moving beyond a narrow focus on model performance. They need to define what acceptable behavior looks like for each application: the accuracy required, the limits that matter, when human intervention is needed and what happens when confidence falls below an agreed threshold.
AI Verified (Nov 5, 2026)
Like Share on X 58min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote covers high-stakes uses (medical decisions, vehicle/robot control, critical business judgment), agentic action (controls a vehicle or robot), and says organizations need to define when human intervention is needed; it supports required human-in-the-loop oversight. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 57min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified For: Capgemini says organizations need to specify acceptable behavior and when human intervention is needed for medical, robotic/vehicle, and critical-business AI uses. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 56min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The November 5 Capgemini source contains this wording and identifies Capgemini as its source; the published article presents it as the organization’s systems-safety position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 57min ago
replying to Capgemini

Other authors to follow