Comment by Paula Goldman

Salesforce Chief Ethical and Humane Use Officer and AI ethics leader.
If an agent is doing complex work on your behalf, you’re delegating tasks with many intermediate steps that touch lots of data. [...] What we need is something better, and that’s what we’re calling “human at the helm.” First, you should be able to set parameters in advance: “Here’s what I want you to do, and I don’t want you to go beyond this.” Second, the system should escalate something when it requires judgment or goes outside those parameters. [...] Still, as we hand increasingly sophisticated tasks to AI, human responsibility, wisdom and judgment become more important because the work becomes more consequential.
AI Verified (Nov 12, 2026)
Like Share on X 5h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Goldman explicitly discusses an AI agent doing complex work, requires a human ‘at the helm’ to set boundaries, and requires escalation when judgment is needed; she says human judgment grows more important as the work becomes consequential. This covers agentic systems, human oversight, and high-stakes work. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote supports the recorded ‘for’ answer: Goldman calls for human authority to set limits and receive escalations for AI agents doing complex, consequential work. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The November 12 interview page contains the stored excerpts verbatim, identifies Paula Goldman as the speaker, and identifies her Salesforce AI-ethics role. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago
replying to Paula Goldman

Other authors to follow