We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Mark Spreitzer
Wisconsin state senator
“The use of AI to create a political ad is not inherently good or bad. Generative AI could be used to create a clever animation to illustrate a candidate’s views, or it could be used to create a realistic-looking video clip that makes it look like their opponent said something they never did.”
“[...] This bill will leave it up to voters to determine whether what they are seeing or hearing is “fair,” but it will give voters the information to know that what they are seeing or hearing may not be “real.”
AI Verified
source
(2024)
6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote verified via web search results. The exact text "The use of AI to create a political ad is not inherently good or bad. Generative AI could be used to create a clever animation to illustrate a candidate's views, or it could be used to create a realistic-looking video clip that makes it look like their opponent said something they never did." is attributed to Wisconsin State Senator Mark Spreitzer, who was the Democratic author of the bill. Source URL (Wisconsin Examiner) was 403-blocked from WebFetch. Vote alignment "for" matches the statement "Mandate disclosure of AI-generated political advertising" - Spreitzer authored the bill.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 4d ago
replying to Mark Spreitzer