Comment by Mozilla Foundation

Regulatory obligations imposed on open source AI providers [...] should also not lose sight of the AI Act’s objective to prevent harm.
Disputed source
Like Share on X 5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The source URL does contain the underlying passage, and the submitted wording is a faithful ellipsis rendering of two consecutive sentences from the article’s section on proportionate obligations. However, the page itself is bylined to two individual authors, “Maximilian Gahntz and Mark Surman,” and dated Aug. 1, 2023, not to Mozilla Foundation. Because the source attributes the text to multiple named individuals rather than a single person, organisation, or named document, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote and must mark the attribution as disputed. ([mozillafoundation.org](https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/openness-ai-fostering-innovation-accountability-in-the-eus-ai-act/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
replying to Mozilla Foundation