Comment by Cheryl Seah

Select models where [...] performance on evaluation and red-teaming efforts are disclosed, over models that don’t – model cards can help with providing this information;
AI Verified source (Nov 2024)
Like Share on X 5mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote is on the same issue: it recommends that open-source model releases disclose evaluation and red-teaming performance, with model cards as the vehicle for that disclosure. That is close to including safety benchmark information in release documentation, so a supportive stance on the complete statement is substantially more likely than opposition. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote favors disclosing "performance on evaluation and red-teaming efforts" and says "model cards can help" provide that information; in the source, this appears in a "Best practices" section about using open-source models safely. That strongly implies support for including safety-benchmark information in release documentation, even though it is framed as a best practice rather than an explicit legal mandate. ([lawgazette.com.sg](https://lawgazette.com.sg/feature/open-source-ai-models/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The supplied Law Gazette page is fetchable, is a November 2024 feature by Cheryl Seah, and line 1039 contains the same sentence, with the submitter’s [...] standing in for omitted middle text; the byline and source page therefore support the quote as authentic and correctly attributed. ([lawgazette.com.sg](https://lawgazette.com.sg/feature/open-source-ai-models/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 14d ago
replying to Cheryl Seah