Comment by Ari Cohn

the best remedy for false or bad speech is true or better a speech, no law will save our democratic institutions
AI Verified source (2023)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote is not directly about AI or elections, but it clearly argues that false or bad speech should be countered by more speech rather than by law. That principle implies opposition to a law prohibiting deceptive AI-generated media about federal candidates. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote argues that for "false or bad speech" the remedy is "true or better speech" and that "no law will save our democratic institutions," which clearly opposes a legal prohibition. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 4d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Verification History

AI Verified The quote is authentic as an excerpt from Ari Cohn’s oral opening statement at the Senate Rules Committee hearing “AI and the Future of Our Elections” on September 27, 2023. The official Congress.gov transcript identifies this section as Cohn’s statement and contains the exact words “the best remedy for false or bad speech is true or better a speech, no law will save our democratic institutions” within a longer sentence. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/senate-event/334885/text)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 5d ago
AI Unverifiable The source_url is congress.gov (118th Congress Senate event 334885 — the Sept 27, 2023 Senate Rules Committee hearing "AI and the Future of Our Elections"), which returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch. Ari Cohn's underlying written testimony PDFs (rules.senate.gov and schumer.senate.gov) also return 403, so I could not open any source to confirm the verbatim quote. What I confirmed independently via web search: (1) Author — Ari Cohn is Free Speech Counsel at TechFreedom and testified at this exact Sept 27, 2023 hearing on AI and elections, matching the bio. (2) Position/sentiment — his testimony argues the remedy for false political speech is more/better speech (citing the Brandeis "more speech, not enforced silence" principle) and that "reflexive legislation ... will not safeguard our democratic values," which matches the gist of the quote. (3) Year 2023 is correct. (4) Vote alignment: he voted "against" statement 408 (criminalizing deepfakes/malicious AI in campaigns), consistent with his free-speech opposition to such laws — correct. However, the exact stored wording ("...true or better a speech, no law will save our democratic institutions") reads like a paraphrase/imperfect rendering and could not be confirmed verbatim, and the source URL is blocked, so marking ai_unverifiable rather than verified. Relevant quote — keep. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 7d ago
replying to Ari Cohn