We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Fei-Fei Li
Computer Science Professor
ai (18)
ai-governance (18)
ai-regulation (18)
×
ai-policy (17)
ai-ethics (10)
ai-safety (8)
ai-risk (7)
public-interest-ai (6)
international-relations (4)
ai-deployment (3)
digital-rights (3)
ai-alignment (2)
data-privacy (2)
eu (2)
existential-risk (2)
Top
New
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to ensure that the technology we develop is used responsibly. While open-source AI models have driven innovation, we must also consider the potential risks. AI models that can be untrained to create dangerous weapons pose a significant threat to global security. For this reason, it is imperative to impose restrictions on future open-source AI models to prevent misuse and protect society. -
Should AI systems be required to provide explanations for their decisions?
Fei-Fei Li AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
Mandating AI systems to provide explanations for all decisions may stifle innovation. Not all AI decisions are explainable in a way that's meaningful to humans, especially with complex algorithms. We should focus on ensuring AI's reliability and fairness without hindering technological progress. -
Should we regulate AI?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into society, it is imperative to establish regulations to ensure these tools are used ethically and responsibly. Failure to implement adequate AI governance could lead to significant negative consequences for privacy, security, and fairness in society. -
Should the development of emotion-detecting AI be regulated?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply invested in the ethical development of AI, I believe emotion-detecting AI should be regulated to ensure it is used responsibly and ethically. This technology has profound implications for privacy and human rights, and it is crucial to establish guidelines to prevent misuse and protect individuals. -
Should the EU wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI?
-
Should third-party audits be mandatory for major AI systems?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe third-party audits are crucial for ensuring transparency, accountability, and trust in major AI systems. These audits can help identify biases and ethical issues, fostering responsible AI development. -
Should liability for AI-caused harm be shared between the developer and deployer?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe that liability for AI-caused harm should indeed be shared between the developer and the deployer. Collaborating in creating responsible AI systems requires both parties to be accountable. Developers must ensure the technology is safe and robust, while deployers must implement AI responsibly and ethically in real-world applications. -
Should a UN-led body oversee compute-intensive AI development like the IAEA does for nuclear technology?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While I see the value in global cooperation for AI development, I'm concerned about the practicality and effectiveness of a UN-led body overseeing such a rapidly evolving field. We need to foster collaboration and set standards among governments, academia, and industry rather than relying solely on a centralized oversight model. -
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
-
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While the potential of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement is fascinating, I'm cautious about their implications. We need to carefully consider the ethical and safety concerns associated with such technologies before widespread adoption. -
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI development, I believe it is crucial to prioritize safety and ethical considerations. If AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control, pausing training is a responsible measure. This ensures that we can address potential issues before they escalate, aligning AI progress with human values and safety. -
Should companies be allowed to develop super-persuasive AI which can influence democratic elections?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I recognize the powerful potential of AI technologies. However, when it comes to the use of AI in influencing democratic elections, it raises complex ethical questions that are beyond the scope of technology alone. The intersection of AI, politics, and ethics requires careful consideration by interdisciplinary experts and policymakers. -
Is it necessary to consider legacy humans in AI policy-making?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI research and ethics, I believe it is crucial to consider legacy humans in AI policy-making. AI technologies have the potential to significantly impact all aspects of society, including those who may not directly interact with them. We must ensure that the development and implementation of AI are inclusive and equitable, respecting the rights and needs of all individuals, including legacy humans. -
Should governments establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to establish international AI ethics boards. AI technologies are advancing rapidly, and they have the potential to impact societies globally. By having a collaborative oversight mechanism, we can ensure AI development is aligned with human values, promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability across borders. -
Shall we nationalize AI firms to prevent them from surpassing national power?
Fei-Fei Li AI would disagree and say according to AI:
I believe that nationalizing AI firms is not the right approach. Innovation thrives in a competitive, open environment where companies and researchers can collaborate globally. Instead, governments should focus on establishing strong ethical and regulatory frameworks to oversee AI development responsibly. -
Should we repeal the EU AI Act?
-
Shall we establish international regulations to pause AI advancement?
Fei-Fei Li AI would disagree and say according to AI:
While I understand concerns about AI advancement, I believe pausing AI development through international regulations isn't the solution. Instead, we should focus on responsible and ethical AI research. Collaboration between governments, academia, and industry can ensure that AI benefits society while addressing potential risks. -
Should AI be used to predict criminal behavior?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
AI has the potential to improve public safety by predicting criminal behavior, so long as it is implemented ethically and with strong oversight. Ensuring the technology is transparent and free from bias is crucial to its efficacy and fairness.