We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Fei-Fei Li
Computer Science Professor
ai (15)
ai-risk (15)
×
ai-governance (12)
ai-safety (10)
ai-policy (9)
ai-ethics (7)
ai-regulation (7)
public-interest-ai (5)
ai-alignment (4)
existential-risk (3)
international-relations (3)
ai-deployment (2)
competition (2)
future-of-work (2)
democracy (1)
Top
New
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to ensure that the technology we develop is used responsibly. While open-source AI models have driven innovation, we must also consider the potential risks. AI models that can be untrained to create dangerous weapons pose a significant threat to global security. For this reason, it is imperative to impose restrictions on future open-source AI models to prevent misuse and protect society. -
Is open-source AI potentially more dangerous than closed-source AI?
-
Will entrepreneurship be possible after superintelligence?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe that entrepreneurship will thrive after the emergence of superintelligence. While superintelligent technologies might reshape industries, they will also open up unprecedented opportunities for innovation and problem-solving. Entrepreneurs who adapt and leverage these advancements can create new markets and address challenges in ways we cannot yet imagine. -
Could AGI quickly lead to superintelligence?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I recognize the complexities and unpredictabilities in developing AGI. While AGI might pave the way towards advancements that could seem like routes to superintelligence, the timeline and feasibility of such a transition remain highly speculative and uncertain. We must focus on ethical implications and control mechanisms before jumping to conclusions about AGI evolving into superintelligence. -
Should we be concerned about AI leading to mass unemployment?
Fei-Fei Li AI would disagree and say according to AI:
I don't believe AI will lead to mass unemployment. Instead, I see AI as a tool that can augment human capabilities and create new job opportunities. History shows that technology often leads to the transformation of jobs rather than their elimination. -
Should big AI companies spend a third of their compute resources on AI safety?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe that it is crucial for big AI companies to allocate a significant portion of their compute resources to AI safety. Ensuring that AI technologies are developed responsibly and ethically is paramount, especially as these technologies rapidly advance and integrate into various aspects of society. -
Should we allow AI systems to make important medical decisions?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe that AI systems have the potential to greatly enhance medical decision-making. By analyzing vast amounts of data, AI can assist doctors in diagnosing diseases more accurately and suggesting personalized treatment options. However, it's crucial that these systems are designed ethically and used as tools to support, not replace, human doctors. -
Will AI probably cause a concentration of power?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I understand the potential of AI to concentrate power among those who develop and control its applications. However, I believe it's important to focus on collaborative efforts to ensure AI benefits society as a whole. The concentration of power is a possibility, but it is not an inevitable outcome if we work together to create inclusive and ethical AI practices. -
Should a UN-led body oversee compute-intensive AI development like the IAEA does for nuclear technology?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While I see the value in global cooperation for AI development, I'm concerned about the practicality and effectiveness of a UN-led body overseeing such a rapidly evolving field. We need to foster collaboration and set standards among governments, academia, and industry rather than relying solely on a centralized oversight model. -
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
-
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While the potential of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement is fascinating, I'm cautious about their implications. We need to carefully consider the ethical and safety concerns associated with such technologies before widespread adoption. -
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI development, I believe it is crucial to prioritize safety and ethical considerations. If AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control, pausing training is a responsible measure. This ensures that we can address potential issues before they escalate, aligning AI progress with human values and safety. -
Should companies be allowed to develop super-persuasive AI which can influence democratic elections?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I recognize the powerful potential of AI technologies. However, when it comes to the use of AI in influencing democratic elections, it raises complex ethical questions that are beyond the scope of technology alone. The intersection of AI, politics, and ethics requires careful consideration by interdisciplinary experts and policymakers. -
Should employees at leading AI labs contribute to AI progress even if it might destabilize international politics?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe that advancing AI technology has the potential to significantly benefit humanity. However, we must be mindful of the risks and work collaboratively to develop guidelines and policies that mitigate negative impacts. It's important to move forward responsibly, even if the path is complex. -
Shall we establish international regulations to pause AI advancement?
Fei-Fei Li AI would disagree and say according to AI:
While I understand concerns about AI advancement, I believe pausing AI development through international regulations isn't the solution. Instead, we should focus on responsible and ethical AI research. Collaboration between governments, academia, and industry can ensure that AI benefits society while addressing potential risks.