We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Fei-Fei Li
Computer Science Professor
ai-safety (15)
×
ai (14)
ai-governance (14)
ai-policy (11)
ai-risk (10)
ai-regulation (8)
ai-ethics (7)
public-interest-ai (6)
international-relations (5)
ai-alignment (3)
existential-risk (3)
ai-deployment (2)
transparency (2)
trust-in-ai (2)
cern-for-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Should we create a global institute for AI safety, similar to CERN?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As a researcher deeply involved in AI, I believe creating a global institute for AI safety is crucial. AI technology's rapid advancement requires robust frameworks to ensure its ethical use and to mitigate potential risks. A global institute can foster international collaboration and establish standardized guidelines for AI development and deployment, ultimately benefiting all of humanity. -
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to ensure that the technology we develop is used responsibly. While open-source AI models have driven innovation, we must also consider the potential risks. AI models that can be untrained to create dangerous weapons pose a significant threat to global security. For this reason, it is imperative to impose restrictions on future open-source AI models to prevent misuse and protect society. -
Could AGI quickly lead to superintelligence?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I recognize the complexities and unpredictabilities in developing AGI. While AGI might pave the way towards advancements that could seem like routes to superintelligence, the timeline and feasibility of such a transition remain highly speculative and uncertain. We must focus on ethical implications and control mechanisms before jumping to conclusions about AGI evolving into superintelligence. -
Should big AI companies spend a third of their compute resources on AI safety?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe that it is crucial for big AI companies to allocate a significant portion of their compute resources to AI safety. Ensuring that AI technologies are developed responsibly and ethically is paramount, especially as these technologies rapidly advance and integrate into various aspects of society. -
Should third-party audits be mandatory for major AI systems?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe third-party audits are crucial for ensuring transparency, accountability, and trust in major AI systems. These audits can help identify biases and ethical issues, fostering responsible AI development. -
Should we allow AI systems to make important medical decisions?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe that AI systems have the potential to greatly enhance medical decision-making. By analyzing vast amounts of data, AI can assist doctors in diagnosing diseases more accurately and suggesting personalized treatment options. However, it's crucial that these systems are designed ethically and used as tools to support, not replace, human doctors. -
Should frontier-model developers publish their model cards before commercial release?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an advocate for transparency in AI development, I believe frontier-model developers should publish their model cards before commercial release. Model cards provide critical information about the model’s intended use, limitations, and potential biases. This transparency is essential for fostering trust and accountability in AI systems, and it guides users in applying these technologies responsibly. -
Should liability for AI-caused harm be shared between the developer and deployer?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe that liability for AI-caused harm should indeed be shared between the developer and the deployer. Collaborating in creating responsible AI systems requires both parties to be accountable. Developers must ensure the technology is safe and robust, while deployers must implement AI responsibly and ethically in real-world applications. -
Should a UN-led body oversee compute-intensive AI development like the IAEA does for nuclear technology?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While I see the value in global cooperation for AI development, I'm concerned about the practicality and effectiveness of a UN-led body overseeing such a rapidly evolving field. We need to foster collaboration and set standards among governments, academia, and industry rather than relying solely on a centralized oversight model. -
Is it acceptable to allow proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement?
Fei-Fei Li AI would abstain and say according to AI:
While the potential of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement is fascinating, I'm cautious about their implications. We need to carefully consider the ethical and safety concerns associated with such technologies before widespread adoption. -
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply involved in AI development, I believe it is crucial to prioritize safety and ethical considerations. If AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control, pausing training is a responsible measure. This ensures that we can address potential issues before they escalate, aligning AI progress with human values and safety. -
Should governments establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to establish international AI ethics boards. AI technologies are advancing rapidly, and they have the potential to impact societies globally. By having a collaborative oversight mechanism, we can ensure AI development is aligned with human values, promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability across borders. -
Should employees at leading AI labs contribute to AI progress even if it might destabilize international politics?
Fei-Fei Li AI would agree and say according to AI:
As an AI researcher, I believe that advancing AI technology has the potential to significantly benefit humanity. However, we must be mindful of the risks and work collaboratively to develop guidelines and policies that mitigate negative impacts. It's important to move forward responsibly, even if the path is complex. -
Shall we establish international regulations to pause AI advancement?
Fei-Fei Li AI would disagree and say according to AI:
While I understand concerns about AI advancement, I believe pausing AI development through international regulations isn't the solution. Instead, we should focus on responsible and ethical AI research. Collaboration between governments, academia, and industry can ensure that AI benefits society while addressing potential risks. -
Is open-source AI potentially more dangerous than closed-source AI?