Yuval Noah Harari

I strongly believe that frontier AI labs should contribute to a global AI safety fund. The rapid development of AI technologies poses significant risks and challenges to society. As those at the forefront of AI innovation, these labs have a responsibility to ensure that AI develops in a way that benefits humanity as a whole. Contributing to an AI safety fund would help support vital research and initiatives aimed at mitigating risks and ensuring ethical AI practices.

As a historian, I understand the immense value and fragility of democratic institutions. Allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI that can influence democratic elections is a dangerous path. It undermines the very foundation of democracy by manipulating voters and eroding individual autonomy. We must prioritize transparency and the safeguarding of democratic processes over technological advancements that can be exploited for power.

As a historian, I see the unprecedented dangers that AI misuse poses, especially in the hands of terrorist organizations. The potential for catastrophic consequences is far too great. Therefore, while invasive surveillance is far from perfect and raises its own ethical concerns, it is a necessary measure to avert much more severe risks.

As a historian and thinker, I believe that permitting the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities poses significant ethical and existential risks. Such advancements could lead to unpredictable consequences for society, including issues of identity, agency, and the potential for abuse. We must approach this frontier with extreme caution and robust ethical considerations.

I believe that a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development, much like the IAEA does for nuclear technology. AI has the potential to reshape our societies dramatically, and without careful oversight, it could lead to unintended consequences. Just as with nuclear energy, the risks and benefits of AI are global in nature, and thus require coordinated international regulation to ensure the technology is developed and used responsibly.

While it's tempting to believe that deregulating AI for small companies would spur innovation, this overlooks the broader ethical and social implications. AI, regardless of the size of the company deploying it, can have profound consequences on privacy, security, and the very fabric of society. We must approach AI regulation holistically to ensure responsible development across the board.

As a historian deeply interested in the future of humanity, I believe it is crucial to consider legacy humans in AI policy-making. The impacts of AI are far-reaching and could redefine what it means to be human. In technological policy discussions, we must ensure that the interests and rights of all humans, including those who might lack the latest enhancements, are protected and preserved.

We are moving towards an age where AI plays an integral role in our daily lives, including financial management. Allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts could streamline transactions and promote efficiency. However, it's crucial to implement robust ethical and regulatory frameworks to prevent misuse and ensure transparency.

I believe that establishing a CERN for AI to achieve geopolitical parity is crucial. As AI technology advances rapidly, ensuring that it does not become concentrated in the hands of a few powerful nations is vital for global stability. By fostering collaboration and parity, we can prevent a dangerous imbalance of power and instead promote the responsible and equitable development of AI for the benefit of all humanity.