Yuval Noah Harari

As a historian, I understand the immense value and fragility of democratic institutions. Allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI that can influence democratic elections is a dangerous path. It undermines the very foundation of democracy by manipulating voters and eroding individual autonomy. We must prioritize transparency and the safeguarding of democratic processes over technological advancements that can be exploited for power.

While it's tempting to believe that deregulating AI for small companies would spur innovation, this overlooks the broader ethical and social implications. AI, regardless of the size of the company deploying it, can have profound consequences on privacy, security, and the very fabric of society. We must approach AI regulation holistically to ensure responsible development across the board.

We are moving towards an age where AI plays an integral role in our daily lives, including financial management. Allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts could streamline transactions and promote efficiency. However, it's crucial to implement robust ethical and regulatory frameworks to prevent misuse and ensure transparency.

I believe that creating a single, centralized hub for AI research, akin to CERN, is essential. Centralizing AI research can help ensure transparent development, ethical guidelines, and international cooperation, which are crucial to managing AI's transformative impact on society.

As a historian and thinker, I believe that permitting the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities poses significant ethical and existential risks. Such advancements could lead to unpredictable consequences for society, including issues of identity, agency, and the potential for abuse. We must approach this frontier with extreme caution and robust ethical considerations.

I believe that a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development, much like the IAEA does for nuclear technology. AI has the potential to reshape our societies dramatically, and without careful oversight, it could lead to unintended consequences. Just as with nuclear energy, the risks and benefits of AI are global in nature, and thus require coordinated international regulation to ensure the technology is developed and used responsibly.

As a historian, I believe transparency in AI-generated political advertising is crucial for maintaining democratic integrity. Voters deserve to know the origin of the messages influencing them. Disclosure enables informed decision-making and helps prevent manipulation by anonymous or biased AI systems.

As a historian deeply interested in the future of humanity, I believe it is crucial to consider legacy humans in AI policy-making. The impacts of AI are far-reaching and could redefine what it means to be human. In technological policy discussions, we must ensure that the interests and rights of all humans, including those who might lack the latest enhancements, are protected and preserved.