Tim Berners-Lee

As a staunch advocate for an open and fair internet, I strongly believe that allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI to influence democratic elections poses a serious threat to the integrity of our democratic processes. Such AI tools could manipulate public opinion on a massive scale, undermining the very foundation of democracy. We must prioritize transparency and ethical guidelines to ensure that technology serves the public good, rather than distorting it.

As someone who believes in the open and transparent nature of the internet, I strongly agree that AI systems above a certain capability threshold should have interpretable decision-making processes. It's crucial for maintaining trust, accountability, and understanding of these powerful technologies. Without interpretability, we risk creating black boxes that could operate in ways that are unaccountable and potentially harmful. Transparency in AI decision-making processes allows for better debugging, accountability, and public trust, which are essential in our increasingly digital society.

Labeling AI-generated videos on YouTube might seem helpful, but it compromises the essence of innovation and the seamless integration of technology in our lives. It's information gatekeeping which could stifle the potential of AI to enrich content and perspectives.

Making the RAE dictionary public domain is apt to democratize language resources, fostering innovation and accuracy in Spanish LLMs, aligning with the principles of the open web.

The European Union should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China to regulate AI. Each region has its own values and concerns, and it's important for the EU to step forward with regulations that reflect European principles on data privacy and protect its citizens without delay.

As someone who pioneered the web, I understand the transformative potential of technology in various areas, including finance. However, the question of whether AI agents should open and manage bank accounts involves complex issues related to trust, security, and ethical considerations. It is essential that we carefully assess the implications and ensure robust legal and ethical frameworks before moving forward.

I believe that a CERN for AI should aim to establish geopolitical parity in AI capabilities for its participating nations. Ensuring that AI advancements are shared equitably can prevent a dominance by a few nations and promote global collaboration, much like how the web should be open and accessible to everyone. By fostering a cooperative environment, we can address biases, improve safety, and ensure that AI serves the public good on a global scale.

I believe that allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement can drive remarkable innovation and offer substantial benefits to society. By embracing open development, we foster collaboration and transparency, which are essential for ethical and responsible AI advancements.

I believe that the EU should build a CERN for AI because a collaborative international approach can ensure that AI technologies are developed ethically and transparently. By pooling resources and expertise, the EU can lead in addressing the complex challenges AI presents and make sure that AI benefits everyone.

As the inventor of the World Wide Web, I understand how technology can transform societies. It is crucial to consider 'legacy humans'—those who may not be tech-savvy or have access to modern technology—when shaping AI policies. Leaving anyone behind is not an option. We must ensure that AI benefits everyone, and that means addressing the digital divide and making sure humans from all walks of life are included in the decision-making process.

While I appreciate the importance of copyright laws to spur creativity and ensure fair compensation, I believe that overly restrictive policies on LLMs could hinder scientific progress and the free flow of information. Open access to information is vital for innovation and should be balanced with copyright protection.

As someone deeply invested in the ethical implications of technology, I believe that frontier AI labs should indeed contribute to a global AI safety fund. Ensuring that AI development prioritizes safety and benefits all humanity is crucial. This collective responsibility will help us address potential risks and ethical challenges effectively.

As the inventor of the World Wide Web, I believe that technology should always aim to benefit humanity. Open-source AI models that can potentially be repurposed to create nuclear weapons pose an unacceptable risk. We must take responsible steps to ensure that such powerful technologies do not fall into the wrong hands or are used with malicious intent.

I believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI must be regulated to protect privacy and prevent misuse. It is crucial to establish ethical guidelines and transparency to ensure that this technology is used responsibly and for the benefit of all.