Comment by COVID-19 Global Risk Assessment- Version 9

While available information is insufficient to definitively conclude the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the independent assessment of SARS-CoV-2 origins report (June 2025) published by the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) reviewed all available evidence for each of the two main hypotheses: introduction from a natural zoonotic source(s) as a spillover event(s) either directly to humans from wild animals or through an intermediate host, or an accidental laboratory-related event, which may have involved exposure to the virus during field research or a breach in laboratory biosafety procedures. It concluded that while a zoonotic origin with spillover from animals to humans is currently considered the best supported hypothesis by the available scientific data, until requests for further information are met or more scientific data becomes available, the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and how it entered the human population will remain inconclusive.
AI Verified source (Feb 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The quote is authentic: it appears verbatim in the WHO PDF under the heading "Virus origins" (page 3 of the PDF, lines 175-183). The WHO publication page identifies the source document as "COVID-19 Global Risk Assessment- Version 9" and lists it as published on 3 February 2026; the PDF itself says the current assessment date is 02 February 2026, so the stored month-level date "Feb 2026" is acceptable. ([cdn.who.int](https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/_sage-2026/20260203_covid-19-risk-assessment_global_v.9.pdf?download=true&sfvrsn=6eff0441_3)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 1h ago
replying to COVID-19 Global Risk Assessment- Version 9