We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by EJW Audio
Econ Journal Watch podcast page covering scholarly debate on COVID-19 origins
Weissman uses a simple analogy to explain the error. Correcting the error using the data, model, and simulations of the original paper reverses the implication of the analysis-the single-introduction likelihood becomes greater than the two-introductions likelihood. That undermines the article’s supposed support for natural origin.AI Verified (Mar 29, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Econ Journal Watch frames the quote as part of the lab-leak vs natural-origin debate, and the quoted passage says correcting the Pekar analysis undermines supposed support for natural origin; that is directly relevant to the full statement. Model: gpt-5-codex.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The source page is titled 'Michael Weissman on Lab Leak and Science' and says correcting the Pekar analysis makes a single introduction likelier and undermines support for natural origin; on this record the stored answer 'for' matches. Model: gpt-5-codex.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 18d ago
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The Econ Journal Watch summary is directly about a Bayesian error in COVID-origins analysis and what the corrected analysis implies, so it is relevant to the framework question.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 19d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote treats correcting the Bayesian analysis as decisive for the inference, which supports the statement that Bayesian analysis is the right framework.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5-codex
· 19d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The source URL is fetchable, and the official Econ Journal Watch episode page for “Michael Weissman on Lab Leak and Science” contains this three-sentence passage verbatim on the page text, with the page dated “Posted 29 Mar 2026.” The page is part of the EJW Audio podcast, and podcast metadata/listings corroborate the EJW Audio/Econ Journal Watch attribution context. ([econjwatch.org](https://econjwatch.org/podcast/michael-weissman-on-lab-leak-and-science))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 20d ago
replying to EJW Audio