Mark Minevich on Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical A…

Mark Minevich

AI strategist, investor, and Forbes contributor writing on AI governance and global technology policy.

Adopting a reporting window of about 72 hours would align with protocols already used in industries such as aviation, nuclear power, and public health emergencies.

AI Verified (Jun 30, 2026)

Source:

Mark Minevich, “The U.S. And China Agree On Almost Nothing Except AI’s Deadliest Risks,” Forbes, June 30, 2026.

2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

votes For

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Quote explicitly endorses a roughly 72-hour reporting window for critical incidents. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Recorded answer for verified. Quote explicitly supports a reporting window of about 72 hours. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Verified against the cited source; wording, attribution, and date match. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

replying to Mark Minevich

Other opinions from Mark Minevich

See all

Mark Minevich votes For

Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models

What unites these efforts is less an ideology of regulation than a shared instinct that the four specific dangers should be tested for, by someone, before a model ships.

Unverifiable source (Jun 30, 2026)