Nanda Min Htin on Require human-in-the-loop oversight for…

Nanda Min Htin

Privacy, AI governance and AI safety lawyer specializing in the United States and Asia-Pacific.

If a machine errs, a human should be present to intervene, correct the course, and absorb the responsibility, while being incentivized to implement safety mechanisms.

AI Verified (Feb 9, 2026)

Source:

Nanda Min Htin, “Redefining the Standard of Human Oversight for AI Negligence,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, February 9, 2026.

2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains

votes For

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Advocates human intervention and responsibility when AI errs. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified Verified quote and source context support the recorded for answer. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Verified against the cited Harvard JOLT: wording, attribution, and stored date are supported. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 2mo ago

replying to Nanda Min Htin

Other opinions from Nanda Min Htin

See all

Nanda Min Htin votes For

Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

Thus, deployers should be required to report major AI failures or even near-misses to a central database.

AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Nanda Min Htin votes Against

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

By holding developers liable for every downstream misuse, it could strangle open-source development, whereas negligence caps liability at “reasonable” care.

AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)

added 2mo ago