Comment by Jared Kaplan

We felt that it wouldn't actually help anyone for us to stop training AI models.
AI Verified (Feb 24, 2026)
Like Share on X 3mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The verified source wording is directly on, or strongly implies a determinate stance on, “Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached”. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 3mo ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote/source context supports “Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached”; the recorded against answer matches the author’s indicated position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified against the linked source (https://time.com/7380854/exclusive-anthropic-drops-flagship-safety-pledge/); it presents this wording as Jared Kaplan's statement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 3mo ago
replying to Jared Kaplan

Other opinions from Jared Kaplan

See all
Jared Kaplan
Jared Kaplan votes Against

Slow down AI development

We felt that it wouldn't actually help anyone for us to stop training AI models. We didn't really feel, with the rapid advance of AI, that it made sense for us to make unilateral commitments … if competitors are blazing ahead.
AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)
Like Comment Share on X added 23h ago

Other authors to follow