Comment by Tom Davidson

So even conditional on the political will for implementing Plan A existing, it currently seems unlikely that US/China follow through on MACD on fabs and robots (most of their economy!). And if they don't, we are back to the problem of dry tinder and the dangerously fast intelligence explosion.
AI Verified (Jul 10, 2026)
Like Share on X 2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Quote says US/China likely would not implement MACD for fabs and robots; directly bears on establishing MACD. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2mo ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Quote says US/China are unlikely to follow through on MACD for fabs and robots; this supports opposition. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Tom Davidson’s source page (July 10, 2026) contains the exact stored wording at paragraph 73. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2mo ago
replying to Tom Davidson

Other opinions from Tom Davidson

See all
Tom Davidson
Tom Davidson votes Against

We should adopt AI 2040 Plan A

Overall, I’m sympathetic to Plan A. The basic logic of the plan is sound: we will need to slow down AI progress at some point; this is a concrete plan for doing that. [...] But currently I lean towards starting with software scaling.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)
Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago

Other authors to follow