Comment by NetChoice

This bill contains a critically flawed mandatory third-party audit requirement that creates an impossible compliance obligation on an unrealistic timeline.
AI Verified (May 26, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quoted opposition expressly criticizes the bill’s mandatory third-party audit requirement, so it determines a stance on this mandate. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded answer against is correct: NetChoice calls the mandatory third-party-audit requirement impossible and opposes SB 315. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified NetChoice’s 26 May 2026 SB 315 opposition testimony contains this wording verbatim; it is presented as NetChoice’s position. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to NetChoice