YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Peter Slattery

Human avatar
Research scientist at MIT FutureTech and the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy, studying AI risks and governance.
This is why laws, treaties and other collective-action mechanisms may become necessary.
AI Verified (Jun 5, 2026)
Source:
Peter Slattery, quoted in “Global experts assess risk of AI catastrophes,” University of Queensland, June 5, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The source frames Slattery’s quote as a response to AI harms and inadequate safety incentives; saying treaties may be necessary strongly indicates support for negotiating an international AI-safety treaty. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer is for: Slattery says treaties and other collective-action mechanisms may be necessary to address AI risks, which supports negotiating a binding international AI-safety treaty. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified verbatim in University of Queensland news article (5 Jun 2026), attributed to Dr Peter Slattery: “This is why laws, treaties and other collective-action mechanisms may become necessary.” · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Peter Slattery