We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Lord Clement-Jones
Tim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expert
With the rise of generative AI and high-quality deepfakes, impersonation has become a uniquely digital weapon of remarkable sophistication. A criminal can now wear a citizen’s face and speak with their voice to commit crimes or cause profound personal distress. This is no longer a theoretical risk: it is happening now at scale. This amendment creates a stand-alone offence that reflects this new reality, targeting the act of impersonation itself—the transactional communication carried out in another’s name without consent.AI Verified (Mar 4, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Clement-Jones advocates a standalone offence for transactional impersonation in another’s name without consent; directly relevant to banning AI impersonation.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Clement-Jones advocates a standalone offence for consentless impersonation; “for” is correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
UK Parliament Hansard, Mar. 4 2026, records this exact Lord Clement-Jones statement during debate on Amendment 366.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
replying to Lord Clement-Jones