Comment by Lord Clement-Jones

Tim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expert
With the rise of generative AI and high-quality deepfakes, impersonation has become a uniquely digital weapon of remarkable sophistication. A criminal can now wear a citizen’s face and speak with their voice to commit crimes or cause profound personal distress. This is no longer a theoretical risk: it is happening now at scale. This amendment creates a stand-alone offence that reflects this new reality, targeting the act of impersonation itself—the transactional communication carried out in another’s name without consent.
AI Verified (Mar 4, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Clement-Jones advocates a standalone offence for transactional impersonation in another’s name without consent; directly relevant to banning AI impersonation. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Clement-Jones advocates a standalone offence for consentless impersonation; “for” is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified UK Parliament Hansard, Mar. 4 2026, records this exact Lord Clement-Jones statement during debate on Amendment 366. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Lord Clement-Jones