Software & Information Industry Association on Mandate third-party audits for major AI…

Software & Information Industry Association

Trade association representing software and digital-content companies; submitted 2026 AI policy recommendations to the U.S. House Science Committee.

SIIA raised particular concerns about applying traditional product liability frameworks to generative AI, regulating frontier models at the state level, and imposing premature audit and transparency requirements without established standards.

AI Verified (Apr 13, 2026)

Source:

Software & Information Industry Association, “SIIA Testifies on Illinois AI Bills, Urges Risk-Based Approach to Protect Innovation and Consumers,” April 13, 2026.

2mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems

votes Against

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified SIIA’s stated concern is premature audit requirements without standards, directly establishing opposition to the proposed audit mandate. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified SIIA opposes premature audit requirements absent standards, so the recorded against answer is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified SIIA’s 2026-04-13 publication reproduces the stored concerns about premature audit and transparency requirements verbatim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 2mo ago

replying to Software & Information Industry Association

Other opinions from Software & Information Industry Association

See all

Software & Information Industry Association votes Against

Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models

Mandating public disclosures could expose vulnerabilities, provide malicious actors with actionable insights, hence undermining the very safety objectives the bill seeks to achieve.

AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)