Comment by Yoshua Bengio

This suggests pacing the advances: not training or deploying AIs without a strong safety case that convinces independent experts.
AI Verified (Sep 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 33min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly supports pacing advanced AI development by withholding training or deployment until a strong independent-expert safety case exists, which is relevant to a safety-conditional ban on superintelligence development. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 32min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The recorded answer is for. Bengio's quote supports a safety-conditional halt on superintelligence development by rejecting training or deployment without a strong independent-expert safety case. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 32min ago
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly calls for not training or deploying AI without a strong safety case from independent experts, making it relevant to requiring safety evaluations before frontier-model deployment. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 32min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The recorded answer is for. Bengio's quote supports requiring pre-deployment safety evaluation by saying AI should not be trained or deployed without a strong safety case from independent experts. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 32min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The canonical Yoshua Bengio page, published September 11, 2026, contains this sentence verbatim in the section “What can be done to mitigate loss-of-control risks,” and identifies Bengio as the sole author. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 32min ago
replying to Yoshua Bengio