Comment by Helen Toner

Interim Executive Director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET); former OpenAI board member
In the absence of a federal regulatory framework for AI, there is broad agreement among AI policy experts with widely varying political views that transparency and disclosure requirements are a minimal, light-touch approach that should be pursued. [...] Disclosure to a third-party auditor is a flexible option that can allow a neutral, independent organization to verify or assess sensitive information while keeping it largely under the AI company’s control, e.g. by having the auditor work within the AI company’s own facilities under a non-disclosure agreement.
AI Verified (Apr 22, 2026)
Like Share on X 51min ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The testimony directly discusses disclosure to independent third-party auditors and says auditors may work inside AI companies’ facilities; this is substantively relevant to employee-like evaluator access. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11min ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The vote author is Helen Toner, matching the quote author. Her support for independent third-party auditors working inside AI companies’ facilities supports statement 478, so the recorded answer ‘for’ is correct. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11min ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified The linked Senate Judiciary PDF identifies Helen Toner and is dated April 22, 2026; pages 6–7 contain the stored wording verbatim, including the third-party-auditor passage. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11min ago
replying to Helen Toner