We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Helen Toner
Interim Executive Director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET); former OpenAI board member
In the absence of a federal regulatory framework for AI, there is broad agreement among AI policy experts with widely varying political views that transparency and disclosure requirements are a minimal, light-touch approach that should be pursued. [...] Disclosure to a third-party auditor is a flexible option that can allow a neutral, independent organization to verify or assess sensitive information while keeping it largely under the AI company’s control, e.g. by having the auditor work within the AI company’s own facilities under a non-disclosure agreement.AI Verified (Apr 22, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The testimony directly discusses disclosure to independent third-party auditors and says auditors may work inside AI companies’ facilities; this is substantively relevant to employee-like evaluator access.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 11min ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The vote author is Helen Toner, matching the quote author. Her support for independent third-party auditors working inside AI companies’ facilities supports statement 478, so the recorded answer ‘for’ is correct.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 11min ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
The linked Senate Judiciary PDF identifies Helen Toner and is dated April 22, 2026; pages 6–7 contain the stored wording verbatim, including the third-party-auditor passage.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 11min ago
replying to Helen Toner