YouCongress
Explore About Sign up

Comment by Pramila Jayapal

Avatar
U.S. Representative (D-WA)
The framework’s new legal authorities to hold AI companies accountable would build on those that already apply. They would not preempt or replace federal, state, and local laws, nor would they prevent or impede law enforcement agencies from enforcing those laws against AI companies or their executives.
Unverified (Oct 1, 2026)
Source:
U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal, “Jayapal Introduces Legislative Framework Establishing National Charter System to Rein in AI,” official press release, October 1, 2026. In describing her National AI Charter Act framework, Jayapal says its legal authorities would not preempt or replace federal, state, or local laws, nor impede their enforcement against AI companies or executives.
Like Share on X 57min ago

Policy proposals and claims

States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
replying to Pramila Jayapal

Other opinions from Pramila Jayapal

See all

Other authors to follow

Dario Amodei Dario Amodei CEO at Anthropic OpenAI OpenAI AI research organization Anthropic Anthropic AI safety research company Yoshua Bengio Yoshua Bengio AI Pioneer, Turing Award winner Sam Altman Sam Altman CEO at OpenAI Demis Hassabis Demis Hassabis Nobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMind António Guterres António Guterres UN Secretary-General Bernie Sanders Bernie Sanders U.S. Senator from Vermont Geoffrey Hinton Geoffrey Hinton Godfather of Deep Learning