We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Cordula Droege
Director of International Law, Movement and Partnerships at the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
States have a responsibility – to their own populations, and to those in other states who will face the consequences of the proliferation and use of AI-enabled weapons and by conflict escalation – to set clear limits. A company cannot determine what international law, including IHL, permits. No safety testing, voluntary commitment or corporate policy substitutes for international rules where a new technology of warfare creates humanitarian risks that the world cannot accept. That is a decision for states, made together, in public, and one they can be held to.AI Verified (Oct 15, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Droege says states must set clear limits on AI-enabled weapons; international law and rules—not voluntary corporate measures—must govern them, and states can be held to the decision.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 58min ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote supports the statement: states should set limits through international rules and law for AI-enabled weapons, rejecting voluntary corporate substitutes.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 58min ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
ICRC’s Oct. 15, 2026 article by Cordula Droege contains this wording verbatim in its discussion of states setting limits on AI-enabled weapons.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5
· 58min ago
replying to Cordula Droege