Comment by Brad Carson

Americans for Responsible Innovation president
ARI recommends targeting developers as a proxy for regulating frontier models. This is preferable to a regime targeting individual models, since today’s frontier systems derive their capabilities from a combination of baseline models, scaffolding, and compute; therefore any threshold defined by model characteristics alone may become obsolete as the field rapidly advances. [...] Additional risk domains such as autonomous harmful conduct; oversight subversion and deceptive alignment; autonomous self-replication and resource acquisition; autonomous AI R&D and high impact internal deployment; and manipulation and influence operations should be considered as additional areas of interest and potential review before deployment is approved.
AI Verified (May 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote identifies frontier systems/developers and calls for review of autonomous AI R&D and high-impact internal deployment before approval, supporting pre-deployment risk assessment. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote supports pre-approval review of high-impact internal deployment and frontier-system risk domains; recorded answer for matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified ARI’s 2026-05-11 letter reproduces this wording on pp. 1–2; it is authored by Brad Carson and includes the cited pre-deployment-review language. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 20d ago
replying to Brad Carson

Other opinions from Brad Carson

See all

Other authors to follow