Comment by Ron Chrisley

Professor of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Sussex, researching consciousness, machine learning, and AI philosophy.
Seth’s argument relies on the unargued-for claim that if computational functionalism is false, conscious AI is impossible. I show why the claim is in need of support by way of an analogy. I use a different analogy, involving artificial flight, to show that even if human consciousness is ineliminably biological, this does not imply the impossibility of non-biological, computational AI.
Unverified (Sep 17, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.
replying to Ron Chrisley

Other authors to follow