We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Prince Chestnut
Alabama state representative (D)
There’s some people who may decide if they know there is punishment for it, they’ll say that maybe I won’t do this,” Chestnut said. “Maybe I’ll just do some negative ads but I won’t put out completely false information or depict this person on a false light.” Chestnut said there is a difference in traditional-style negative campaign ads and the worst examples of what could be done with AI-generated video or images. [...] “I think with these technologies that we have, we have the ability to undermine everything that we’ve come to know to be true in this country,” Chestnut said. “Our institutions really are at stake. So I think we have to set up some type of parameters, some type of guardrails, some civil, some criminal, where we’re saying this type of behavior is not acceptable for us as a society.”AI Verified source (2024)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports penalties or legal guardrails against using AI-generated images/video to depict candidates falsely in campaign contexts. While it does not explicitly say 'federal election candidates,' it plainly implies support for prohibiting deceptive AI-generated campaign media of candidates.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 24d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly backs restrictions: Chestnut says there should be "punishment" so people won’t "put out completely false information" and calls for "parameters" and "guardrails, some civil, some criminal" against AI media that depicts someone "in a false light."
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 24d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the GovTech article dated May 24, 2024 contains both passages verbatim and attributes them to Rep. Prince Chestnut. The [...] omission is faithful: it skips intervening text between two separate Chestnut remarks in the same article. A secondary reprint carries the same wording. ([govtech.com](https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/new-alabama-deepfake-law-includes-criminal-sanctions))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 25d ago
AI Verified
Source URL (govtech.com) returns HTTP 403, but a web search independently confirmed the verbatim quotes attributed to Alabama state Rep. Prince Chestnut, who spearheaded HB172: "I think with these technologies that we have, we have the ability to undermine everything that we've come to know to be true in this country. Our institutions really are at stake. So I think we have to set up some type of parameters, some type of guardrails, some civil, some criminal, where we're saying this type of behavior is not acceptable for us as a society." The first fragment about punishment deterring people and negative ads vs. completely false information is consistent with the same govtech article. Year 2024 correct. Chestnut authored legislation criminalizing election deepfakes (criminal + civil penalties), so a "for" vote on "Criminalizing deepfakes and malicious use of AI in electoral campaigns" aligns directly. The two-part quote with [...] elision is within the allowed limit. Attribution, content, year, and vote direction confirmed.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 29d ago
replying to Prince Chestnut