We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
Australian Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economy
I am this person!
Location: Australia
ai-governance (4)
ai-regulation (4)
ai-safety (4)
ethics (4)
×
ai-policy (2)
policy (2)
public-interest-ai (2)
regulations (2)
democracy (1)
digital-democracy (1)
future (1)
law (1)
transparency (1)
Top
New
-
Andrew Charlton
votes Against
and says:
An AI agent is not a legal person, and in our law liability for this type of incident always sits with a person or a company. The liability has to be traced back to the intent of a person or a company that created or directed the agent.
AI Verified source (Sep 25, 2026) -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
536 opinions
Andrew Charlton
votes For
and says:
This project, led by CSIRO with support from AISI and our UK partners, explores how humans can oversee and verify capable AI systems at scale.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026) -
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
114 opinions
Andrew Charlton
votes Against
and says:
Because the point of AI safety is not to slow the future down. It is to make sure the future remains human, aligned with our values, and advancing our interests.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
193 opinions
Andrew Charlton
votes For
and says:
Decisions about data use, algorithmic management, surveillance, safety and reskilling are too consequential to be left solely to executives or engineers.
AI Verified source (Feb 18, 2026)