Ben Goertzel

I believe we should repeal the EU AI Act because it imposes overly restrictive regulations that could stifle innovation and slow down the progress of advanced AI research. The development of artificial intelligence requires an environment that encourages experimentation and rapid iteration. The current framework risks deterring startups and researchers who wish to explore new frontiers in AI technology.

I strongly believe that the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement is essential for the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence. Open research fosters innovation and collaboration, pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve. By allowing these models to evolve and improve themselves, we can accelerate the development of beneficial technologies that address many of the world's most pressing challenges.

I believe that the development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should not be monopolized by a single entity. Innovation thrives in a competitive environment, and diversity in approaches increases the likelihood of creating beneficial ASI systems. Ensuring multiple perspectives and voices in ASI development is essential for the technology to be aligned with broader human values.

I believe that halting AI research based on a precautionary principle can stifle innovation and progress. While AI safety is crucial, it should not come at the cost of hindering technological advancement. Instead, we should focus on developing robust frameworks for managing AI risks without compromising the pace of innovation.

While I understand the intent behind establishing international AI ethics boards, I am concerned that government-led initiatives may stifle innovation and development. AI is a rapidly evolving field, and top-down regulations could hinder progress. Instead, I believe AI ethics should be guided by a diverse and dynamic community of researchers, developers, and ethicists from around the world, allowing for a more adaptive and nuanced approach.

While including a diverse set of voices is important, the technical complexity and rapid evolution of AI require specialized expertise. Governance decisions should prioritize input from those with deep technical understanding, and we must balance inclusivity with efficiency to ensure effective oversight.

Pausing AI advancement through international regulations is not the right approach. Innovation in AI is critical for addressing global challenges and improving human life. Instead of halting progress, we should focus on creating ethical guidelines and collaborative frameworks to ensure AI benefits everyone.

As someone deeply invested in the future of AGI, I believe it's vital that AI technologies are accessible to all countries. Equitable access fosters innovation and helps ensure diverse perspectives in AI development, which is crucial for creating systems that benefit all of humanity. We need global governance frameworks that prioritize inclusivity and fairness to prevent a technological divide.

As an AI researcher, the complexity of international dynamics makes it difficult to say definitively whether the EU should wait for a common agreement with the US and China. While global cooperation could enhance regulatory effectiveness, waiting might slow necessary progress. The EU must balance collaboration with timely action.

As someone deeply engaged in the development of artificial general intelligence, I believe that while AI policy-making is crucial, whether or not specific emphasis should be placed on 'legacy humans' is a complex issue. The term 'legacy humans' implies a separation that may not align with the holistic approach I advocate for in integrating AI into society. We must consider all humans in shaping AI's future impacts.

While AI safety is undoubtedly important, dedicating a third of compute resources solely to it may stifle innovation and progress. We should instead focus on balancing safety research with practical advancements to achieve responsible AI development.