We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (4)
ai-policy (4)
ai-safety (4)
public-interest-ai (4)
×
ai-regulation (3)
policy (3)
regulations (3)
gov (2)
transparency (2)
democracy (1)
digital-democracy (1)
ethics (1)
international-relations (1)
open-source (1)
research-policy (1)
Top
New
-
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
86 opinions
Chris Lehane
votes For
and says:
First, the federal government should lead the testing and evaluation of the most advanced systems. Frontier AI raises national security and public safety questions that require technical expertise, resources, and access that no state can fully replic...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026) -
Chris Lehane
votes For
and says:
Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026) -
Chris Lehane
votes For
and says:
Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
193 opinions
Chris Lehane
votes For
and says:
As AI capabilities continue to advance, we believe effective safety frameworks should continue to be developed through democratic institutions, informed by technical expertise and broad stakeholder input, to promote accountability and public trust.
AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)