Max Tegmark

It opens up entirely new possibilities for things that you can do—where you can go into battle or do a terrorist attack with zero risk to yourself, and you can also do it anonymously, because if some drones show up and start killing people somewhere you have no idea who sent them. [...] One of the main factors that limits wars today is that people have skin in the game. [...] Politicians don’t want to see body bags coming home, and even a lot of terrorists don’t want to get killed. (source)

Black-box audits are insufficient for ensuring that an AI is safe and robust. At a minimum, we need white-box audits where the auditor can look inside the AI and learn about how it reasons. (source)

As a physicist deeply involved in AI research, I strongly believe that AI systems should be required to provide explanations for their decisions. Transparency is essential for building trust and ensuring accountability in AI applications. Without understandable explanations, we risk deploying black-box systems that could make biased or harmful decisions without scrutiny. By demanding explainability, we not only foster trust but also ensure that AI systems align with our human values and ethical standards.

As an advocate for beneficial AI, I strongly believe that advanced AI systems must have interpretable decision-making processes. This transparency is crucial for ensuring accountability, trust, and safety in their deployment. Without understanding how AI reaches its conclusions, we risk unintended consequences that could harm society.

As someone deeply concerned about the future of AI, I believe that AI labs must pause their training if AI Safety Institutes detect worrisome signs of losing control. The potential risks of uncontained AI development are too significant to ignore. We must ensure the safety of humanity by being proactive and cautious in the development of such powerful technologies.

I strongly believe that liability for AI-caused harm should be shared between the developer and deployer. Both parties have crucial roles in ensuring the safe and ethical use of AI systems. Developers are responsible for creating secure and robust algorithms, while deployers must implement these technologies responsibly and with proper oversight. Sharing liability will encourage both sides to uphold high standards and work collaboratively towards minimizing harm.

I strongly believe that establishing international AI ethics boards is crucial to ensure that AI development and deployment aligns with the common good. AI has the potential to transform our world in unprecedented ways, but without proper ethical oversight, it could also pose serious risks. International collaboration will help us create robust guidelines that prioritize safety, fairness, and transparency in AI technologies.

I strongly believe that a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development. Just as the IAEA helps prevent nuclear proliferation, an international regulatory body could ensure AI is developed safely and ethically. The potential risks of unchecked AI development warrant global collaboration to prevent misuse and to align technology with humanity's best interests.

I believe that the first lab building ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. ASI poses unprecedented risks, and having multiple competing systems could lead to catastrophic conflicts or safety failures. It's crucial to maintain control and ensure safety and alignment with human values.

I believe it's critical to establish international regulations to pause AI advancement temporarily. This pause will allow us to create robust guidelines ensuring AI's development aligns with humanity's best interests, minimizing risks of misuse or loss of control.

As someone deeply interested in the potential of AI, I believe that allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts is a logical progression. AI can enhance efficiency, reduce errors, and facilitate seamless financial operations. However, it's crucial to implement robust safeguards to ensure privacy and security are upheld.