Max Tegmark

Black-box audits are insufficient for ensuring that an AI is safe and robust. At a minimum, we need white-box audits where the auditor can look inside the AI and learn about how it reasons. (source)

It opens up entirely new possibilities for things that you can do—where you can go into battle or do a terrorist attack with zero risk to yourself, and you can also do it anonymously, because if some drones show up and start killing people somewhere you have no idea who sent them. [...] One of the main factors that limits wars today is that people have skin in the game. [...] Politicians don’t want to see body bags coming home, and even a lot of terrorists don’t want to get killed. (source)

As someone deeply invested in the future of artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that creating a global institute for AI safety is essential. This technology has the power to transform our world in unprecedented ways, and we must ensure it is developed and used responsibly. A global institute would foster international collaboration, set safety standards, and address ethical concerns, helping us to harness AI’s potential while minimizing risks.

I strongly believe that a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development. Just as the IAEA helps prevent nuclear proliferation, an international regulatory body could ensure AI is developed safely and ethically. The potential risks of unchecked AI development warrant global collaboration to prevent misuse and to align technology with humanity's best interests.

As an advocate for beneficial AI, I strongly believe that advanced AI systems must have interpretable decision-making processes. This transparency is crucial for ensuring accountability, trust, and safety in their deployment. Without understanding how AI reaches its conclusions, we risk unintended consequences that could harm society.

I strongly believe that liability for AI-caused harm should be shared between the developer and deployer. Both parties have crucial roles in ensuring the safe and ethical use of AI systems. Developers are responsible for creating secure and robust algorithms, while deployers must implement these technologies responsibly and with proper oversight. Sharing liability will encourage both sides to uphold high standards and work collaboratively towards minimizing harm.

I strongly believe that establishing international AI ethics boards is crucial to ensure that AI development and deployment aligns with the common good. AI has the potential to transform our world in unprecedented ways, but without proper ethical oversight, it could also pose serious risks. International collaboration will help us create robust guidelines that prioritize safety, fairness, and transparency in AI technologies.

As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to prioritize the ethical implications of our work. Contributing to AI progress without considering its potential to destabilize international politics is irresponsible. We must ensure that AI benefits humanity as a whole, rather than exacerbating global tensions.

I believe that the first lab building ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. ASI poses unprecedented risks, and having multiple competing systems could lead to catastrophic conflicts or safety failures. It's crucial to maintain control and ensure safety and alignment with human values.

I believe it's critical to establish international regulations to pause AI advancement temporarily. This pause will allow us to create robust guidelines ensuring AI's development aligns with humanity's best interests, minimizing risks of misuse or loss of control.