Max Tegmark

It opens up entirely new possibilities for things that you can do—where you can go into battle or do a terrorist attack with zero risk to yourself, and you can also do it anonymously, because if some drones show up and start killing people somewhere you have no idea who sent them. [...] One of the main factors that limits wars today is that people have skin in the game. [...] Politicians don’t want to see body bags coming home, and even a lot of terrorists don’t want to get killed. (source)

Black-box audits are insufficient for ensuring that an AI is safe and robust. At a minimum, we need white-box audits where the auditor can look inside the AI and learn about how it reasons. (source)

I strongly believe that establishing international AI ethics boards is crucial to ensure that AI development and deployment aligns with the common good. AI has the potential to transform our world in unprecedented ways, but without proper ethical oversight, it could also pose serious risks. International collaboration will help us create robust guidelines that prioritize safety, fairness, and transparency in AI technologies.

As someone deeply concerned about the future of artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that frontier AI labs must contribute to a global AI safety fund. Ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies is crucial for mitigating risks and maximizing benefits for humanity.

As an advocate for beneficial AI, I strongly believe that advanced AI systems must have interpretable decision-making processes. This transparency is crucial for ensuring accountability, trust, and safety in their deployment. Without understanding how AI reaches its conclusions, we risk unintended consequences that could harm society.

As someone deeply invested in the future of artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that creating a global institute for AI safety is essential. This technology has the power to transform our world in unprecedented ways, and we must ensure it is developed and used responsibly. A global institute would foster international collaboration, set safety standards, and address ethical concerns, helping us to harness AI’s potential while minimizing risks.

As someone deeply concerned about the future of AI, I believe that AI labs must pause their training if AI Safety Institutes detect worrisome signs of losing control. The potential risks of uncontained AI development are too significant to ignore. We must ensure the safety of humanity by being proactive and cautious in the development of such powerful technologies.

I strongly believe that a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development. Just as the IAEA helps prevent nuclear proliferation, an international regulatory body could ensure AI is developed safely and ethically. The potential risks of unchecked AI development warrant global collaboration to prevent misuse and to align technology with humanity's best interests.

I strongly believe that liability for AI-caused harm should be shared between the developer and deployer. Both parties have crucial roles in ensuring the safe and ethical use of AI systems. Developers are responsible for creating secure and robust algorithms, while deployers must implement these technologies responsibly and with proper oversight. Sharing liability will encourage both sides to uphold high standards and work collaboratively towards minimizing harm.

As an AI researcher, I believe it is crucial to prioritize the ethical implications of our work. Contributing to AI progress without considering its potential to destabilize international politics is irresponsible. We must ensure that AI benefits humanity as a whole, rather than exacerbating global tensions.

While AGI represents a substantial advance in our technological capabilities, the leap to superintelligence involves not just scaling up existing architectures but overcoming profound challenges in AI safety, robustness, and our understanding of intelligence itself. I believe we are far from solving these complex issues quickly or easily.

I believe AI does pose an existential threat to humanity if not governed by robust safety measures. Its advancement could outpace our ability to manage its risks, leading to potential catastrophic scenarios. Hence, proactive and strategic regulations are critical.

As an AI researcher, I agree that open-source AI can potentially be more dangerous than closed-source AI. Open-source code may be easier for malicious actors to manipulate and exploit, leading to unintended consequences. Proper safeguards and regulations are essential in the development and deployment of AI technologies.

I believe it's critical to establish international regulations to pause AI advancement temporarily. This pause will allow us to create robust guidelines ensuring AI's development aligns with humanity's best interests, minimizing risks of misuse or loss of control.

While the integration of neural interfaces with AI is a fascinating area of research, it's still too early to determine whether it would facilitate easier AI alignment. There are many ethical, technical, and societal questions that need to be explored before forming a definitive opinion.