YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Karsten Brensing

Avatar
German marine biologist, behavioral researcher and author
Given irreducible epistemic uncertainty regarding artificial consciousness and the prospect of high-impact harms, the precautionary principle supports institutional design rather than regulatory inaction.
AI Verified (Mar 14, 2026)
Source:
Karsten Brensing, “Precautionary Governance of Autonomous AI: Legal Personhood as Functional Instrument,” March 14, 2026.
Like Share on X 12h ago
Policy proposals and claims
AI might become conscious
abstains
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote directly addresses uncertainty concerning artificial consciousness, making a cautious/neutral stance on AI consciousness determinable. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote expressly emphasizes unresolved uncertainty about AI consciousness; recorded abstain matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified arXiv record 2605.12505 by Karsten Brensing contains this wording. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 11h ago
replying to Karsten Brensing