Karsten Brensing on AI might become conscious

Karsten Brensing

German marine biologist, behavioral researcher and author

Given irreducible epistemic uncertainty regarding artificial consciousness and the prospect of high-impact harms, the precautionary principle supports institutional design rather than regulatory inaction.

AI Verified (Mar 14, 2026)

Source:

Karsten Brensing, “Precautionary Governance of Autonomous AI: Legal Personhood as Functional Instrument,” March 14, 2026.

3mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

AI might become conscious

abstains

Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified The quote directly addresses uncertainty concerning artificial consciousness, making a cautious/neutral stance on AI consciousness determinable. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 3mo ago

Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

AI Verified The quote expressly emphasizes unresolved uncertainty about AI consciousness; recorded abstain matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 3mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified arXiv record 2605.12505 by Karsten Brensing contains this wording. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 3mo ago

replying to Karsten Brensing

Other opinions from Karsten Brensing

See all

Karsten Brensing votes For

AI agents should be granted legal personhood as non-human corporations

This article advances limited legal personhood as a functional governance instrument for advanced AI systems. [...] it proposes a two-tier corporate architecture.

AI Verified source (Mar 14, 2026)