Comment by Luke Drago

AI researcher at Thinking Machines.
Many proposals for a slowdown or pause concentrate power — they centralize control of AI into a few hands and leave us worse off. I think we can do better. I’m signing because I believe we may need mechanisms to coordinate AI progress in the future, and inventing it in a crisis is a sure way to get a bad mechanism. We have to tread a path through a narrow corridor if we want to build coordination mechanisms that don’t let one actor own the future, and the earlier we can get to work on that the better.
AI Verified (Jul 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quoted support for global coordination, pacing, or safety mechanisms directly bears on building global slowdown capability. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The author’s signed personal comment supports coordination and safety/pacing capacity; this matches the recorded “for” answer. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Source page lists Luke Drago’s personal comment verbatim; July 2026 publication. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Luke Drago