We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by The Linux Foundation
Nonprofit consortium supporting open-source technology ecosystems
As policymakers and regulators work through questions of AI safety, the distinction that matters is not open versus closed, but transparent and secure versus opaque and unexamined. Open models and open tooling should be recognized as defensive assets that enable transparency, independent evaluation, and shared remediation, rather than treated as a security liability.AI Verified (Jul 27, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote argues against treating open models and tooling as liabilities, directly bearing on a public-R&D mandate.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The source rejects an open-versus-closed mandate and favors transparent, secure systems; against matches.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Linux Foundation blog (July 27, 2026) contains this wording in its policymaker note.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
replying to The Linux Foundation