We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by The Linux Foundation
Nonprofit consortium supporting open-source technology ecosystems
As policymakers and regulators work through questions of AI safety, the distinction that matters is not open versus closed, but transparent and secure versus opaque and unexamined. Open models and open tooling should be recognized as defensive assets that enable transparency, independent evaluation, and shared remediation, rather than treated as a security liability.AI Verified (Jul 27, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The Foundation explicitly rejects treating open models as a security liability and calls them defensive assets.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Answer against matches the claim that open models are defensive assets, not a security liability.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Linux Foundation’s 27 Jul 2026 post, written by the Foundation, contains the quoted passage verbatim.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
replying to The Linux Foundation