We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities
July 2026 international consensus report on AI safety research priorities produced by over 100 contributors from 13 countries.
Priorities include: evaluations that still work even when a model can determine if it is being tested and may therefore understate its harmful capabilities (“sandbagging”) or conceal misalignment (“alignment faking”), backed by secure access for independent third parties; assessing control-undermining capabilities and propensities and defining clear, operationalizable red lines; verifying that AI systems used to supervise other AI are themselves trustworthy; keeping a model’s step-by-step “chains-of-thought” honest and human-readable so they can be monitored; and metrics for AI R&D automation and secure infrastructure giving external authorities awareness of internal deployments crossing regulatory thresholds.AI Unverifiable (Jul 7, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Unverifiable
Singapore AISI page confirms the titled report and 7 Jul 2026 date, but does not expose the quoted passage; insufficient evidence to authenticate.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
replying to The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities